Sybill AI alternatives in 2026: 8 tools compared on price, CRM autofill, MCP and hosting

Prices, G2 ratings and MCP status checked on 6 October 2026.

Article overview

• The main Sybill alternatives in 2026 are Claap, Gong, Avoma, Attention, Modjo and Momentum, plus Fathom and Fireflies as lighter notetakers. They differ most on three things Sybill buyers ask about: how many CRM fields get filled, whether AI agents can write back through MCP, and where call data is stored.
• Sybill is an AI sales assistant, not a forecasting platform. It writes meeting summaries, follow-up emails and pre-meeting briefs, fills CRM fields after calls and answers deal questions through Ask Sybill. It was founded in 2020 in Mountain View, California.
• Sybill publishes its prices. Free plan, Pro at $30 and Business at $90 per user per month billed annually ($36 and $108 monthly), Enterprise on quote. CRM autofill, the API and the MCP server start on Business.
• Sybill's CRM autofill is capped at 10 fields on Business. Unlimited fields and SSO need the Enterprise plan.
• Sybill's MCP server is read-only. Its documented tools ask, list and get conversations, deals and accounts. None of them writes to the CRM.
• Sybill hosts its data in the US. Its help center says its infrastructure and data storage run on AWS servers in the US. Claap and Modjo host in the EU.
• Sybill's bot-free recorder needs a recent Mac. The Invisible Recorder is a desktop app that currently requires a Mac with Apple Silicon. On other machines, a bot joins the call.

Sales reps spend 70% of their time on non-selling tasks, according to Salesforce's State of Sales survey of 5,500 sales professionals (Salesforce, July 2024). That is the problem Sybill sells against: notes, follow-up emails and CRM updates done for the rep. Most tools in this list now promise the same thing, so the useful comparison is in the details: how many CRM fields each plan fills, whether your AI assistant can act on the data or only read it, which machines can record without a bot, and which country your recordings live in. This guide compares 8 Sybill alternatives on those points, with prices and G2 ratings checked on 6 October 2026, and shares what a buyer comparing Sybill with Claap told us.

Sybill alternatives at a glance

Prices are each vendor's published annual-billing list prices on 6 October 2026, except Gong (Vendr's third-party median contract). G2 ratings read on g2.com on 6 October 2026. We did not find a G2 listing we could confirm for Momentum (momentum.io).

What Sybill is, in 2026

Sybill calls itself an "AI Sales Assistant for Revenue Teams". Its pitch on sybill.ai: it "automates busywork like CRM updates, email follow-ups, proposals, and collateral, and learns from past deals". Here is what that covers, checked on Sybill's site and help center on 6 October 2026:

• Execution: pre-meeting briefs, meeting and deal summaries (Magic Summaries), follow-up emails, CRM autofill, AI tasks, decks and dashboards.
• Intelligence: Ask Sybill (questions in plain English, answers with citations), deal inspection, coaching and performance, competitor intelligence, sales plays.
• Capture: Zoom, Google Meet, Teams and Webex; dialers including Aircall, Dialpad, Nooks, Outreach, RingCentral, Zoom Phone and HubSpot; Gmail and Outlook; a mobile app for in-person meetings.
• CRMs: HubSpot, Salesforce, Zoho, Dynamics, Pipedrive and NetSuite.
• Languages: 100+.
• Company: founded 2020 in Mountain View by Gorish Aggarwal (CEO), Nishit Asnani, Soumyarka Mondal and Mehak Aggarwal. Sybill raised an $11 million Series A led by Greycroft in July 2024, $14.5 million in total (TechCrunch). We found no later round.

Sybill does not sell a roll-up forecasting module: forecasting appears in its marketing copy and as a question you can ask Ask Sybill, not as a forecast product like Gong Forecast or Clari.

A note on spelling: "Sibyl AI" is a common misspelling. Most products actually named Sibyl AI are unrelated to sales. The sales assistant is Sybill, at sybill.ai.

How much Sybill costs in 2026

Sybill publishes its pricing at sybill.ai/pricing. Read on 6 October 2026:

Three things to check before you buy:

• The field cap. CRM autofill, the feature most Sybill buyers come for, starts on Business and fills up to 10 fields. If your process tracks more (MEDDPICC alone has 8 letters, before next steps, competitor and budget), you are looking at Enterprise.
• Credits. Ask Sybill threads, pipeline analysis, deck and dashboard creation, API calls and task execution consume credits on every plan. Summaries, briefs, follow-ups and autofill do not.
• A 14-day Business trial is available without a credit card, which is the honest way to test the autofill on your own deals.

A worked example for a 20-rep team on the plan that fills the CRM, per year (list prices, annual billing):

Sybill, Avoma and Momentum bill in US dollars, Claap in euros, so compare at the exchange rate of the day. Each figure is the vendor's published list price on 6 October 2026, before any discount.

What a Sybill buyer told us

Claap is a conversation intelligence tool, so we record our own sales calls. Sybill rarely comes up in them: in Claap deals from Q2 and Q3 2026 where the buyer's evaluated competitors were recorded, none listed Sybill, against 45% for Modjo and 30% for Gong. Our pipeline leans toward European teams, and Sybill sells mostly in the US, so that tells you about our market more than about Sybill's.

One buyer did compare Sybill with Claap and Avoma in September 2026: the GTM operations director of a US B2B data company with about 25 sellers, moving off [their previous call platform]. What he said is worth hearing because it cuts both ways:

• On the shortlist: "I think all three are different flavors. That was hard to make a choice on."
• On the difference: Claap is "extremely MCP centric, uh, AI centric, which is what we like. But it's also more of a Swiss Army knife. Which means that you kind of have to build your own thing for now [...] versus the other ones are a bit more prescriptive in certain things like the coaching and [...] scorecards."
• On the category: "they are unique versions of an approach to [their previous call platform]."

That is a fair summary of the trade-off. Sybill and Avoma ship more opinionated coaching and summaries out of the box. Claap gives you fields, scorecards and an MCP your own AI assistant can act on, which takes a little more setup.

Methodology and limits: one buyer account mentioned Sybill on a recorded call between October 2025 and September 2026, so we share his words, not percentages. Deal shares come from Claap's Q2 and Q3 2026 deals with recorded competitor evaluations; the account quoted above did not list Sybill in that field, so Sybill is likely undercounted. The quote is anonymized and the other vendor he named is replaced with a description in brackets.

The 8 best Sybill alternatives in 2026

1. Claap

Best for: sales teams of 5 to 100 reps that want their call data hosted in the EU, CRM fields filled from every call, and AI agents that can update the CRM, not only read it.

Overview. Claap is a conversation intelligence platform by lemlist. It records video calls without a bot, from a Chrome extension on Windows or Mac or from the Mac desktop app, plus phone calls from dialers such as Aircall and Ringover, and emails. Each call fills the AI fields you define (budget, decision-maker, competitor, next step), per meeting, deal and account, synced to HubSpot or Salesforce, and a new field also runs on past calls. Calls are scored against your framework (SPICED, MEDDIC or your own). Claap's MCP server lets Claude or ChatGPT read your calls and write back: create a field and its view, or update a deal's stage, owner and amount in HubSpot. Claap is hosted in the EU, GDPR compliant, SOC 2 Type II certified and transcribes 99+ languages.

Pricing. Free Basic plan, which includes the MCP. Pro is €24 per seat per month billed annually (€30 monthly). Business is €48 per seat per month billed annually (€60 monthly) and adds CRM auto-complete, AI-generated emails, AI coaching, deal insights and ClaapAgent across all meetings. Enterprise is priced on quote and adds SSO, SCIM and migration support.

Pros

• EU hosting, GDPR, SOC 2 Type II and no training on your calls
• MCP that reads and writes, on every plan including free
• Bot-free recording on Windows or Mac

Cons

• Less prescriptive out of the box than Sybill: you define the fields and scorecards your team needs
• Deal forecasting from calls is on the Enterprise plan only
• Smaller review base than Gong, and AI credits cap usage on Pro and Business

→ Compare in detail: Claap vs Sybill

2. Gong

Best for: enterprise revenue teams with a RevOps function that want call intelligence and forecasting from one vendor.

Overview. Gong is the reference in conversation intelligence, and one of the vendors Sybill's own comparison pages target. It adds Gong Forecast, deal boards and engagement on top of call analytics. Gong made Custom Agents generally available in June 2026 and announced Agent Builder in September 2026.

Pricing. Not public. Gong charges per user plus a platform fee (gong.io/pricing). Vendr's median contract is $55,359 per year.

Pros

• The deepest call analytics and the largest review base in the category
• Forecasting and call intelligence from one vendor
• EU data hosting option

Cons

• Platform fee and annual contract, no free plan
• Gong's MCP server is read-only and returns AI summaries rather than transcripts, per Gong's documentation

→ Compare in detail: Claap vs Gong

3. Avoma

Best for: SMB and mid-market teams that want notes, call intelligence and a simple forecast with list prices.

Overview. Avoma combines AI notes, scheduling, conversation intelligence and a forecast tool. Call intelligence and revenue intelligence are paid add-ons on top of the base plan.

Pricing. Startup $19, Organization $24, Enterprise $39 per recorder seat per month, billed annually. Conversation Intelligence and Revenue Intelligence add-ons are $29 each per seat per month. 14-day free trial.

Pros

• Published prices and a free trial
• Scheduler, notes and coaching in one tool
• MCP server

Cons

• Call intelligence and forecasting are both add-ons
• EU data hosting not stated publicly

→ Compare in detail: Claap vs Avoma

4. Attention

Best for: US revenue teams that want call data to trigger CRM updates and workflows, and have RevOps time to set them up.

Overview. Attention automates follow-ups, CRM filling and call scorecards, and scores deals from conversation data. It has the largest MCP surface we found: 81 tools with read and write scopes.

Pricing. Not public.

Pros

• Read and write MCP with 81 tools
• Strong CRM auto-fill and scorecards
• Conversation-based deal scoring

Cons

• No public pricing
• Little public documentation on EU data residency

→ Compare in detail: Claap vs Attention

5. Modjo

Best for: French and European mid-market sales teams that want an EU-hosted vendor.

Overview. Modjo is a Paris-based conversation intelligence platform founded in 2019. It records and transcribes sales calls and runs AI agents on them for meeting prep, deal review and follow-ups. Modjo hosts its data on AWS in Paris and is SOC 2 Type II certified.

Pricing. Not public. Modjo's pricing page says it is "optimal from 3 sales reps".

Pros

• EU hosting in Paris, SOC 2 Type II and GDPR
• Broad CRM coverage, including Dynamics 365, Pipedrive and Sellsy
• MCP server

Cons

• No public pricing
• Smaller review base outside France

→ Compare in detail: Claap vs Modjo

6. Momentum

Best for: Salesforce-heavy revenue teams that want CRM hygiene and deal workflows automated from calls.

Overview. Momentum turns call content into CRM updates, follow-ups and Slack deal rooms, with exec briefs and AI coaching on its Transformation plan. Its notetaker and video library are sold as a Conversation Intelligence add-on.

Pricing. Business $69 and Transformation $99 per user per month on annual plans, Enterprise custom (momentum.io/pricing). The Conversation Intelligence add-on is $30 per user per month.

Pros

• Published prices
• CRM hygiene and Slack deal rooms in the base plan

Cons

• The notetaker is a paid add-on
• No free plan, and no public MCP server found

7. Fathom

Best for: individuals and small teams who want a free, high-quality notetaker with light CRM logging.

Overview. Fathom is an AI notetaker founded in 2020. Its free plan includes unlimited recordings and transcriptions, and it has the highest G2 score in this list. Field-level CRM sync to HubSpot and Salesforce is on the Business plan.

Pricing. Free plan. Team $15 per seat per month annual (2+ users). Business $25 annual.

Pros

• Generous free plan
• 5.0 on G2 from 7,064 reviews
• API and MCP on paid plans

Cons

• CRM field sync only on Business
• Not built for coaching, deal risk or deal reviews

8. Fireflies

Best for: teams that want cheap, searchable meeting notes rather than deal coaching.

Overview. Fireflies is an AI meeting assistant founded in 2016. It records, transcribes and summarises meetings across Zoom, Meet and Teams, and offers an official MCP server. It is a notetaker first, for every kind of meeting.

Pricing. Free plan. Pro $10 per seat per month annual. Business $19 annual. Enterprise $39 annual.

Pros

• Lowest paid tier in this list
• Free plan
• Official MCP server

Cons

• Languages other than English are in beta, per Fireflies
• No deal-level coaching or scorecards comparable to Sybill's

Feature comparison

"Not verified", "not stated" and "not checked" mean we could not confirm it from the vendor's public documentation on 6 October 2026. We will update this table when vendors document it.

When you should stay on Sybill

Sybill is a well-reviewed product (4.8 on G2 from 150 reviews), and for some teams it is the right fit. Stay on Sybill if:

• Your reps want a ready-made assistant more than a data layer. Pre-meeting briefs, follow-up emails, summaries and a deal workspace work out of the box, with less setup than a tool where you define your own fields.
• Your team is in the US and on recent Macs. US hosting is not a constraint for you, and the Invisible Recorder covers bot-free recording.
• Ten CRM fields cover your process, or you are on Enterprise already.
• You use one of Sybill's long tail of dialers, such as Nooks or Dialpad, and want calls from it in the same place.

How to choose the right Sybill alternative

1. Count your CRM fields. List the fields you want filled after every call. If it is more than 10, compare Sybill Enterprise with tools that fill the fields you define on a published plan.
2. Decide what your AI assistant should be allowed to do. If you want Claude or ChatGPT to update deals, not only answer questions, check that the MCP server can write and on which plan.
3. Check where recordings are stored. For European teams, ask for the hosting region, the subprocessors that handle transcription and a DPA before the trial, not after.
4. Check bot-free recording on your team's machines. If part of the team is on Windows, test it there.
5. Run 10 real calls through your top two tools and compare what lands in HubSpot or Salesforce, field by field.
6. Price the plan you will actually use. The plan that fills the CRM is the one to compare, not the entry price.

How we built this comparison

• Vendor facts (pricing, plans, recording, MCP, hosting) come from each vendor's own website, help center and documentation, checked on 6 October 2026. Gong's contract figure is Vendr's third-party median, labelled as such.
• G2 ratings were read on g2.com on 6 October 2026.
• Buyer data comes from Claap sales calls (October 2025 to September 2026) where an external buyer mentioned Sybill, and from Claap deals in Q2 and Q3 2026 with recorded competitor evaluations. Only the buyer's own words were quoted.
• Conflict of interest: Claap is one of the tools in this list. We have tried to state Claap's limitations as plainly as those of other tools, including that Sybill is more prescriptive out of the box. If you spot an error about any vendor, write to us and we will correct it.

Related articles

• Claap vs Sybill
• Best Gong alternatives in 2026
• Clari competitors and alternatives in 2026
• What is conversation intelligence?